ANNEX 1 BIBLIOGRAPHY

1. Bamberger, M., Rugh, J., Church, M., & Fort, L. (2003), Shoestring Evaluation: Designing Impact Evaluations under Time, Budget and Data Constraints. American Journal of Evaluation 2004; 25: 5-37. (See also recent publication: Ref. No. 15 below)

2. Beck, T. (2006), Evaluating humanitarian action using the OECDDAC criteria: An ALNAP guide for humanitarian agencies. London, UK: Overseas Development Institute. http://www.alnap.org/publications/eha_dac/pdfs/eha_2006.pdf

3. Breier, H. (2005), Joint Evaluations: Recent Experiences, Lessons Learnt and Options for the Future, DAC Evaluation network Paper, OECD, Paris. http://www.oecd.org/dataoecd/28/9/35353699.pdf

4. Danish Ministry of Foreign Affairs, Guidelines for Program Management. Copenhagen. Updated regularly only on http://www.amg.um.dk/en

5. European Commission (2001), Guide to Ex Ante Evaluation. Brussels. http://www.ec.europa.eu.int/comm/budget/evaluation/pdf/ex_ante_guide_ en.pdf

6. Freeman, T. (2004), Managing the External Evaluation Team During Joint Evaluations: Challenges and Responses. Ottawa, Canada: Goss Gilroy Inc. http://www.ggi.ca

7. Hallam, A. (1998), Evaluating Humanitarian Assistance Programmes in Complex Emergencies. London, UK: ODI. Good Practice Review 7.

8. OECD (2006), DAC Evaluation Quality Standards. OECD, Paris. http://www.oecd.org/dataoecd/30/62/36596604.pdf

9. OECD (1991), Principles for Evaluation of Development Assistance. OECD, Paris. http://www.oecd.org/dataoecd/secure/9/11/31779367.pdf

10. OECD (2006), DAC Guidance for Managing Joint Evaluations. OECD, Paris. http://www.oecd.org/dataoecd/28/14/37484787.pdf

11. OECD (2002), DAC Glossary of Key Terms in Evaluation and Results Based Management. OECD, Paris. www.oecd. http://www.oecd.org/dataoecd/29/21/27594804.pdf

12. OECD (1999), Guidance for Evaluating Humanitarian Assistance in Complex Emergencies. OECD, Paris. http://www.oecd.org/dataoecd/9/50/2667294.pdf

13. Paris Declaration on Aid Effectiveness: Ownership, Harmonisation, Alignment, Results and Mutual Accountability. http://www.oecd.org/dataoecd/11/41/34428351.pdf

14. Trochim, W. M. K. (2002), Research Knowledge Database. http://www.socialresearchmethods.net/kb/

15. Weiss, H. B. (Summer 2005), The Evaluation Exchange: Editorial. Harvard Family Research Project.

16. World Bank (2006), Conducting Quality Impact Evaluations under Budget, Time and Data Constraints. http://www.worldbank.org/ieg/ie/